Disruption, innovation … in the dynamic business world, disruption is the game’s name. We’ve witnessed repeatedly how companies that dare to innovate, challenge norms, and pivot swiftly often leave a lasting mark in their industries. But what lies at the heart of these disruptive ventures? Is it mere luck, or is there a systematic, underlying method to the madness? This article aims to peel back the layers, diving deep into the tools, methodologies, and mindsets many disruptive companies adopt.
At the intersection of traditional models and avant-garde strategies, businesses embark on a journey that weaves human-centric design, rapid feedback loops, and visionary leadership. Through real-world scenarios infused with a dash of humour, we’ll juxtapose old practices with fresh approaches, offering insights that resonate with both the rookie and the veteran. So, whether you’re at the helm of a fledgling startup or steering a well-established giant, these insights might be the catalyst for your next giant leap.
Table of Content
- The Essentials of Modern Disruption
- The Common Toolkit for Innovation
- The Underestimated Power of Mindset
- Brainstorming and Ideation
- Your Guide to Creative Thinking
- Prioritising and Making Decisions
- Design for Six Sigma (DFSS)
- Understanding the Six Sigma Approach
- Tools for Each Phase of DFSS
- Lean Innovation

The Essentials of Modern Disruption
Innovation is more than a buzzword in today’s business landscape—it’s necessary. Leading companies rely on various methodologies, strategies, and mindsets to stay ahead of the curve. From the user-focused lens of Design Thinking to the fast-paced adaptability of the Lean Startup Methodology, these approaches guide firms in their quest for groundbreaking products and services. But as we navigate the intricacies of these tools, a central theme emerges: while techniques and strategies are pivotal, the true catalyst for disruption lies in the mindset and culture of an organisation. The visionary leadership and commitment to innovation truly set disruptive companies apart.
Companies that create disruptive products or services often employ a combination of tools, methodologies, and mindsets. Here are some of the most commonly used:
- Design Thinking: This human-centred approach focuses on understanding the end user’s needs, desires, and pain points. It involves iterative ideation, prototyping, and testing processes to arrive at innovative solutions.
- Lean Startup Methodology: This approach emphasises building a minimal viable product (MVP), getting it to market quickly, collecting feedback, and then iterating based on that feedback. The focus is on learning and adapting quickly.
- Blue Ocean Strategy: This strategy involves creating a new market space or “blue ocean” rather than competing in existing markets. The goal is to make the competition irrelevant by offering a unique value proposition.
- Open Innovation: Companies collaborate with external partners, such as startups, universities, or customers, to co-create and innovate. This allows them to tap into a broader pool of ideas and expertise.
- Agile Development: This iterative methodology allows companies to respond quickly to changing market demands. Agile teams work in short “sprints” to develop and improve products based on continuous feedback.
- Jobs-to-be-Done Framework: This theory suggests that customers “hire” products or services to get specific jobs done. Companies can design solutions that better meet customers’ needs by understanding these jobs.
- Cross-functional Teams: Bringing together experts from various disciplines (e.g., engineering, design, marketing) fosters diverse perspectives and holistic problem-solving.
- User Experience (UX) Design: Prioritising the user experience ensures that products are functional but also delightful and intuitive for users.
- Rapid Prototyping: This allows companies to visualise and test ideas quickly, gather feedback, and make improvements before investing heavily in full-scale production.
- Continuous Learning and Adaptation: Cultivating a culture of constant learning and being open to change is crucial. This often involves regular training, workshops, and exposure to emerging trends and technologies.
- Intellectual Property Strategy: Protecting innovations through patents, trademarks, and copyrights can provide a competitive edge and prevent imitations.
- Voice of the Customer (VoC) Programs: Collecting and analysing customer feedback can provide valuable insights into their needs, preferences, and pain points.
- Scenario Planning: Companies can prepare and strategise for potential disruptions or market changes by envisioning various future scenarios.
- Investment in R&D: Consistent investment in research and development can fuel continuous innovation and keep the company at the forefront of its industry.
- Culture of Innovation: Companies like Apple prioritise a culture that encourages risk-taking, experimentation, and “thinking outside the box.”
It’s worth noting that while tools and techniques are essential, the mindset and culture of the organisation play a crucial role. Genuinely disruptive companies often have visionary leadership, foster innovation, and are unafraid to challenge the status quo.
Innovation Brainstorming and Ideation
Let’s delve into the tools and methods used for brainstorming, prioritisation, and converging during the ideation and development phases of a product or service beyond just software:
- Brainstorming & Ideation Tools:
- Whiteboards & Flipcharts: The classic tools for spontaneous idea generation.
- Post-it Notes: Used for jotting down ideas and clustering them into themes.
- Mind Mapping Tools: Apps like MindMeister or XMind help visualise and connect ideas.
- Online Collaboration Boards: Tools like Miro and MURAL allow remote teams to brainstorm and collaborate in real time.
- Prioritisation Methods:
- MoSCoW Method: Categorizing tasks into Must have, Should have, Could have, and Won’t have.
- RICE Scoring: Prioritising based on Reach, Impact, Confidence, and Effort.
- Kano Model: Categorizing features based on how they are perceived by users and their effect on user satisfaction.
- Dot Voting: Team members vote on their preferred ideas using stickers or dots.
- Value vs. Effort Matrix: Plotting ideas based on their perceived value and the effort required to execute them.
- Converging & Decision-making:
- SWOT Analysis: Evaluating the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats of an idea or decision.
- Pugh Matrix: A decision matrix that helps determine the best idea or option among a set.
- Six Thinking Hats: A parallel thinking process that helps teams consider problems from different perspectives.
- Affinity Diagramming: Grouping ideas into clusters based on their natural relationships.
- Validation & Feedback:
- Concept Testing: Presenting a single concept to stakeholders or users to gather feedback.
- Prototyping: Creating a low-fidelity version of a product to test its viability.
- Focus Groups: A moderated discussion with users to dive deep into their needs and reactions.
- Feedback Grid: A simple grid categorises feedback into what to Start, Stop, Continue, or Do More Of.
- Collaboration & Alignment:
- Stakeholder Mapping: Identifying and understanding stakeholders to ensure their needs and concerns are addressed.
- Journey Mapping: Visualising the user’s experience over time to identify opportunities and pain points.
- Persona Development: Creating fictional characters based on user research to represent different user types.
- Time Management & Productivity:
- Timeboxing: Allocating a fixed period to a task or activity.
- Pomodoro Technique: Breaking work into intervals (usually 25 minutes) separated by short breaks.
- Gantt Charts: A type of bar chart that illustrates a project schedule.
- Facilitation Techniques:
- Nominal Group Technique (NGT): A structured method for group brainstorming that encourages contributions from everyone.
- Round Robin: Ensuring everyone has an equal opportunity to contribute.
While some of these tools and techniques may seem simple, they’re tried and accurate, highly effective methods, primarily when facilitated well. They help teams navigate the complexities of product development, from the initial brainstorming phase to decision-making and validation.
Design For Six Sigma (DFSS)
More about Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) is a methodology aimed at designing or redesigning products, services, and processes to meet Six Sigma standards immediately. Here’s a step-by-step breakdown:
- Define:
- Objective: Understand and define the project goals, scope, and customer needs.
- Activities:
- Identify the project’s stakeholders.
- Define the project’s objectives and scope.
- Gather Voice of the Customer (VOC) data through surveys, interviews, focus groups, etc.
- Convert VOC data into Critical-to-Quality (CTQ) characteristics—specific, measurable attributes the product or service must possess.
- Measure:
- Objective: Determine and validate the metrics that will be used to assess performance.
- Activities:
- Identify key performance indicators (KPIs) related to CTQ characteristics.
- Benchmark against competitors or similar products/services.
- Determine the current performance levels (if redesigning an existing product/service).
- Validate measurement systems to ensure their accuracy and reliability.
- Analyse:
- Objective: Analyse potential causes of variance or failure that could prevent meeting Six Sigma standards.
- Activities:
- Use tools like Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to translate customer needs into specific design requirements.
- Develop conceptual designs and evaluate them against the requirements.
- Identify potential risks or failure modes using techniques like Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA).
- Determine root causes of potential failures and assess their impact.
- Design:
- Objective: Develop detailed designs and optimise them based on analysis.
- Activities:
- Generate detailed design solutions.
- Apply optimisation techniques to refine the designs.
- Use simulation or prototyping to validate the design against the requirements.
- Conduct iterative design reviews, incorporating feedback to improve the design.
- Ensure that the design meets both customer requirements and Six Sigma quality levels.
- Verify:
- Objective: Test and validate the final design in real-world conditions to ensure it meets Six Sigma standards.
- Activities:
- Develop a testing or validation plan.
- Conduct pilot runs or beta testing, if applicable.
- Collect and analyse data to verify the design meets the defined CTQ characteristics.
- Review feedback and make any necessary adjustments to the design.
- Confirm that the design meets the defined Six Sigma quality levels.
- Finalise documentation and prepare for full-scale production or deployment.
- Control (Sometimes Included):
- Objective: Ensure the design meets Six Sigma standards during full-scale production or deployment.
- Activities:
- Develop control plans to monitor performance.
- Train personnel in the proper execution of processes.
- Monitor KPIs and CTQ characteristics to ensure consistent performance.
- Implement feedback loops to identify and address any deviations from Six Sigma standards.
Throughout the DFSS process, it’s essential to maintain a strong focus on the customer’s needs and to use data-driven decision-making. The goal is to design products, services, or processes that meet and exceed customer expectations while adhering to Six Sigma quality standards.
DFSS Tools
Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) employs a variety of tools throughout its stages to ensure that the methodology’s goals are achieved efficiently. Here’s a breakdown of the tools commonly used during each phase:
- Define:
- Project Charter: Outlines the project’s scope, goals, stakeholders, and constraints.
- Stakeholder Analysis: Identifies and assesses the interests and influence of those involved in the project.
- Voice of the Customer (VOC): Tools like surveys, interviews, and focus groups gather customer needs and feedback.
- Critical-to-Quality (CTQ) Trees: Translate VOC data into specific, measurable requirements.
- SIPOC (Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, Customers) Diagram: Provides a high-level view of the process and its stakeholders.
- Measure:
- Benchmarking: Compares performance against competitors or similar products/services.
- Kano Model: Categorizes customer preferences into essential, performance, and delighter categories.
- Quality Function Deployment (QFD) / House of Quality: Translates customer needs into specific design requirements.
- Measurement System Analysis (MSA): Ensures the accuracy and reliability of measurement systems.
- Analyse:
- Functional Analysis: Break down the product or process into its primary functions and sub-functions.
- Pugh Matrix: Evaluates and compares different design concepts.
- Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA): Identifies potential failure modes and their impact.
- Design of Experiments (DOE): Evaluate multiple variables’ effects on an outcome.
- Root Cause Analysis: Techniques like the 5 Whys or fishbone diagram (Ishikawa) identify the root causes of potential issues.
- Design:
- TRIZ: A problem-solving tool to generate innovative solutions.
- Morphological Analysis: Explores all possible design solutions in a structured manner.
- Simulation Tools: Software tools that mimic real-world processes or systems to test designs.
- Prototyping: Creates a working model of the solution for testing and validation.
- Optimisation Techniques: Refine the design to achieve the best possible performance.
- Verify:
- Pilot Runs or Beta Testing: Tests the solution in a limited or controlled environment.
- Statistical Process Control (SPC): Monitors and controls the quality of processes.
- Control Charts: Tracks process performance over time to detect deviations from standards.
- Capability Analysis: Evaluate the ability of a process to produce products that meet specifications.
- Verification and Validation (V&V): Ensures that the product meets all requirements and performs as intended.
- Control (Sometimes Included):
- Control Plans: Outline procedures and controls that will be implemented to maintain quality.
- Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs): Detailed, written instructions for consistent execution of processes.
- Feedback Loops: Mechanisms to gather and address feedback from users or processes.
- Dashboards and Scorecards: Visual tools for monitoring and reporting key performance indicators (KPIs).
While this list provides a comprehensive overview, the specific tools used in a DFSS project can vary based on the industry, the nature of the project, and the team’s preferences, the key is to choose the tools that best fit the task at hand and provide the most valuable insights.
What Does Lean Bring to Innovation?
Lean and Six Sigma methodologies have often been integrated, leading to a combined approach known as Lean Six Sigma (LSS). Within this integrated framework, the principles of Lean, which focus on waste elimination and process flow optimisation, are combined with the data-driven defect-reduction focus of Six Sigma.
While DFSS (Design for Six Sigma) is primarily a Six Sigma concept, integrating Lean principles into the design and redesign processes is undoubtedly possible. When Lean principles are applied to DFSS, it can be considered a “Lean DFSS” approach, even though that term isn’t as commonly used in the industry.
In a “Lean DFSS” approach, you’d expect to see:
- Customer-Centric Design: Both Lean and DFSS emphasise meeting or exceeding customer requirements. The design process would prioritise features and functions that add value from the customer’s perspective.
- Waste Elimination: Lean primarily focuses on eliminating waste (non-value-added activities). In a design context, this could involve streamlining the design process, reducing unnecessary features, or simplifying the product to make it more efficient to produce and use.
- Flow Optimisation: Lean emphasises smooth flow in processes. In design, this could translate to designing products that are easier to manufacture, distribute, and service, reducing bottlenecks in the production process.
- Iterative Prototyping: Rapid prototyping and testing to quickly identify and eliminate waste and inefficiencies in the design.
- Standardisation: Creating standardised processes in the design phase to ensure consistency, reduce variation, and streamline production.
- Integrated Teams: Cross-functional teams that include members from design, manufacturing, marketing, and other relevant departments to ensure that the entire product lifecycle is considered in the design phase.
- Continuous Improvement: Emphasising Kaizen (continuous improvement) in the design process, ensuring that products are regularly evaluated and improved upon.
While the term “Lean DFSS” isn’t standard terminology, the principles of Lean can undoubtedly be integrated into the DFSS methodology to optimise the design process, reduce waste, and ensure that products are designed with both quality and efficiency in mind.
Conclusion: Navigating the Labyrinth of Innovation with a Compass of Culture
As we’ve traversed through the fascinating labyrinth of modern innovation, one thing has become abundantly clear: it’s not merely about tools, methodologies, or even shiny new technologies. While Design Thinking, Lean Startup Methodology, and Design for Six Sigma all have their merits, they’re mere instruments in an orchestra, not the conductor. The maestro, if you will, is the culture and mindset of an organisation orchestrated by visionary leadership.
The secret sauce for disruptive innovation isn’t in a PowerPoint slide full of flowcharts or a conference room brimming with Post-it notes. It emanates from a deeply ingrained ethos of curiosity, a relentless pursuit of excellence, and an appetite for calculated risks—characteristics that no tool can instil but only a fertile corporate culture can nurture. So, if you find yourself dazzled by the allure of trendy buzzwords or lost in the tangle of methodologies, take a step back and look inward. Is your organisation’s culture primed for innovation? Are you fostering a workplace where creativity is not just encouraged but celebrated?
Finally, to turn the tables a bit, let’s chuckle at the irony of the situation. Here we are, dissecting methodologies designed to eliminate wastefulness whilst possibly wasting away the most crucial element—our ingenuity. Innovation, my dear reader, is both the journey and the destination. So why not make it memorable, filled with failures as badges of honour and successes as stepping stones, all fuelled by a culture that understands the true essence of innovation?
Organizations can navigate the choppy waters of modern business by mastering the intricate dance between traditional methodologies and the free-spirited nature of disruptive thinking. And as they do, they might stumble upon the most remarkable innovation of all: themselves.
So, don your thinking cap, roll up your sleeves, and prepare to navigate the thrilling terrain of innovation. But remember, while your toolkit is essential, don’t forget to pack your culture—it’s the accurate compass you’ll need on this remarkable journey.
Also Read:
Blueprint for Disruption, Innovation and DFSS
TRIZ, HOQ (QFD) and other Advanced Innovation Tools
Innovative Process Evolution System (IPES)® – The Future of Process Excellence
Unleashing the Power of ChatGPT for Continuous Improvement
Virtual and Augmented Reality in Process Improvement
Blockchain in Process Improvement: Using Distributed Ledgers to Streamline Processes
If you like what you read in this article
simply drop us a note with your contact details and we’ll get right back to you.
and require assitance using these concepts and tools in you business,