To structure continuous improvement or not to structure

To structure continuous improvement or not to structure is a question on the lies of many business leaders today. Like most things in life, continuous improvement to has a life cycle, and the implementation approach thereof has gone through several iterations.

structure continuous improvement

I challenge you to name one business that has the luxury of not needing to continuously improve to maintain or better its performance.

Whether a producer of widgets or provider of a service, whether transactional or operational process orientated, to remain competitive, improvement is a fundamental imperative. Striving for better performance remains a competitive priority and only second to ensuring cash is generated and done so in a humanly safe environment.

Why then is it so rare to find organizations that prioritize continuous improvement to such an extent? And then, to structure continuous improvement or not to structure?

Many leaders express the need for improvement, and even go so far as to say all the right things, but fail to fully commit because of “other” priorities. Priorities that may have been better dealt with, or perhaps may not have even occurred, with a continuous improvement program in place that touches all facets of the business.

Organizations that Structure Continuous Improvement

There are those organizations that have had continuous improvement programs in place and evolved in one of two directions. The first is the organization that has successfully inculcated continuous improvement into its culture which eventually only requires a low level of maintenance.

The second is the organization that has had mixed results after having been at it for a few years. In these organizations, one may notice an influential proportion of the employee population providing resistance, often subtle.

Often this form of resistance is underpinned by a sense of arrogance driven by “we know best and do not require your assistance”. While this may be true at a given point in time, the risk of not seeking to continually challenge to improve performance is that complacency will set in, and with that the eventual loss of the once held competitive advantage.

Or maybe not! Is this an example of conventional structured deployment thinking?

This brings to the fore two interesting questions on the Tonic of to structure continuous improvement or not to structure:

  1. Is a structured performance improvement program suitable for every organisation?
  2. Under what circumstances is it best to allow improvement to take place organically?

Additional Articles

Lean processes
Basic Improvement
Pietro from Profitable Processes

Lean Processes

Lean Processes = Lean Manufacturing and Lean Services  Lean processes are applied to manufacturing and services equally well. Lean is a process philosophy that guides

Read More »
process productivity
Process Excellence
Pietro from Profitable Processes

Increase Process Productivity

Increase your process productivity to go to the core of where a great many profit improvement opportunities lie in waiting for your to release it.

Read More »
Image
Leadership
Pietro from Profitable Processes

8 Process Excellence KSF

The 8 process excellence KSF (key success factors) in combination creates a holistic system that promotes excellence in process output. Several authors, many of them gurus

Read More »
innovation design for six sigma
Process Excellence
Pietro from Profitable Processes

How to Innovate

This article offers a basic overview of “how to innovate”. Follow on posts will provide deeper insights into this topic. A wise man once said

Read More »
Project Timelines Differ
Process Improvement
Pietro from Profitable Processes

Improvement Project Cycle Time

Improvement Project Cycle Time – Outdated Doctrine An outdated improvement project cycle time doctrine: “It works, but why does it seem that the lean six sigma project

Read More »
process complexity
Leadership
Pietro from Profitable Processes

Is Process Complexity An Excuse?

“This process is too complex” is an Excuse for Poor Management  Using process complexity as an excuse begs the question to what degree poor management

Read More »
Process improvement levers
Process Improvement
Pietro from Profitable Processes

Process Improvement Levers

Process improvement levers focus the organization’s performance and improvement levers on the factors and variables that have a significant influence on its objectives. Here I am giving in

Read More »